Wildcard sub-addressing (*.username@domain) — possible without Catch-All?
Problem reported by Bastian - 7/8/2026 at 12:48 AM
Submitted

Hi all,


I’m evaluating SmarterMail and I’m looking for the cleanest way to route mail like:


*.ax@domain.tld       →  axel‘s mailbox
*.letters@domain.tld  →  peter’s mailbox

So the identifying part sits at the end of the local part, not after + like standard sub-addressing.


I know I can approximate this with domain-level filtering rules, but that seems to require enabling Catch-All first, so the server accepts mail for any unmatched local part before the rule sorts it out — not great from a spam standpoint.


Questions:


    1.    Is there a native way to do this without Catch-All?

    2.    If not, is suffix-based wildcard aliasing on the roadmap?


Thanks!

Bastian


Sébastien Riccio Replied
This is doable but the other way:


ax+something@domain.tld   
ax+otherthing@domain.tld

This is called "Plus addressing".

https://help.smartertools.com/SmarterMail/Current/Topics/User/PlusAddressing

AFAIK it is configurable on a per mailbox level and you can chose what to do with mails received that uses a Plus addressing recipient:


Kind regards.
Sébastien Riccio
System & Network Admin

Bastian Replied
Hello Sébastian,

Thanks for the reply! Yes, I’m aware of + addressing — that part works fine for new setups. The issue is that these suffix-style aliases (*.alias@) have been in active use for years, tied to a previous mail server that supports this pattern natively. So it’s not something I can just switch to + tags, since these addresses are already established and in use.


That’s why I’m hoping for a native way to keep that exact pattern working without relying on Catch-All.


Bastian




Sébastien Riccio Replied
Oh okay, I understand. I personally have no idea popping about how you could address this.

Maybe someone else will, I hope :)
Sébastien Riccio
System & Network Admin

Douglas Foster Replied
You can do that with alias names, but if you need a lot of folder names for a lot of users, it will be difficult to set up and keep working.

I think your best bet is to use an inbound gateway to convert the old addressing scheme to plus addresses, then educate users to use plus addressing in the future.

I suspect PostFix is the best tool to use for your incoming gateway, because address remapping is one of its key design features.
Bastian Replied

Thanks also for confirming the Postfix approach.


You’re right, there are quite a lot of these addresses, and unfortunately not something I can easily change everywhere.


In principle, all that would be needed is for the MTA to strip everything up to the last dot and map the suffix to a mailbox like a normal Alias — so anything.bm@domain.tld could resolve to a mailbox.

It would be great if SmarterMail simply allowed a wildcard (*) when creating an alias address.


I’m coming from Kerio Connect, which handles this natively, and Axigen does as well. I did consider a Postfix gateway in front, but then I’d also need to run spam filtering there, which defeats a lot of the point of consolidating on SmarterMail.


I think as long as SmarterMail doesn’t support this natively, my only realistic option is Catch-All with a rule to drop anything unmatched.


Thanks again for taking the time to help think this through.




Douglas Foster Replied
I have a different philosophy.  I start from the position that unwanted email is a distributed denial of service attack, with both a technical component (system workload) and human component (opportunity cost of staff time and attention).   To minimize the technical attack, I want email filtering to occur on an inbound gateway, so that the filtering process cannot affect internal-only mail delivery, outbound mail delivery, or webmail response time.   I also view inbound filtering as fundamentally different from filtering of internal-only and outbound mail, so I do not want to put inbound and other mail through the same filtering process.

MailsBestFriend.com has been selling email filtering products, to work closely with SmarterMail, for years.  More recently, they have developed some PostFix competence, so they may be an option for you to consider. 
Bastian Replied
That's a compelling philosophy, framing it as a DDoS problem makes a lot of sense architecturally.
That said, external gateways are often great but not always flexible enough for fine-tuning. Which product did you mean from MailsBestFriend? Declude?
I tried SpamExperts as an inbound gateway, but results were poor with non-English mail — quite a few false positives. spambarrier.de works well for German mail, but even there it's either too much getting through or too much blocked.
I think that's just the nature of running a mail system though — it needs ongoing tuning, inbound and outbound, no matter which tools you use.
Douglas Foster Replied
I just answered your product question with a long post under this topic

Reply to Thread

Enter the verification text