outbound rules
Problem reported by Sabatino - 12/9/2025 at 4:39 AM
Submitted
Microsoft blocked one of my IP addresses again for no apparent reason.
It's been a long time now... I was hoping it wouldn't happen again.

Again, I filed all the reports after checking that the IP had a good reputation (sender score) and wasn't on any blacklists.

By the way, do the services


and
work for you?

Once again, I had to do it on the entire server while waiting for MS to deign to respond, due to the lack of outbound rules.

Please, SM, the lack of them is really frustrating.
Sabatino Traini
      Chief Information Officer
Genial s.r.l. 
Martinsicuro - Italy

Derek Curtis Replied
Employee Post
I think what you're looking for is coming. A new, upcoming feature is "Routing Rules" which are, essentially, "content filters for the spool". They are system-level rules for incoming or outgoing messages. (Or both.) Look for them in our next release. 
Derek Curtis COO SmarterTools Inc. www.smartertools.com
Sabatino Replied
The problem with Microsoft seems to have been resolved very quickly.

I filed a report here

and shortly after, the IP addresses were working again.

Well, I think they made some mistakes.
Sabatino Traini Chief Information Officer Genial s.r.l. Martinsicuro - Italy
Sabatino Replied
Hi Derek, I'm really excited that this request has finally been accepted.
I've been waiting and asking for this for a long time.

I'd just like to point out a few things I expect and hope it really solves everything.

Here are some examples:

1) If the recipient is + @hotmail.com, use the xxxxx gateway

(This would greatly solve IP wormup problems and possible unilateral Microsoft blocks, which are often unfounded.)

2) If it's a bounce, use the xxxxx gateway.
3) If it's a forward, use the xxxxx gateway.
4) If it's a forward from an alias, use the xxxxx gateway.

(The 2, 3, and 4 would keep the primary IPs' reputation high. Unfortunately, it would be nice to prevent users from using aliases or forwarding to external destinations, but that's not possible.)

5) The ability to set some users to only send to local users (on the domain, not the server). This is something I was forced to do with an external gateway.
Sabatino Traini Chief Information Officer Genial s.r.l. Martinsicuro - Italy
Derek Curtis Replied
Employee Post
I believe 1, 2, and 3 are definitely possible. #4 should be possible as well as you can set the From address (your alias) and whether it's a forward, and if so, have that route through a specific gateway. #5 may be different, and I'll need to explore that some more. 

EDIT: Regarding #5, you can, of course, route messages from specific users through a specific gateway using Routing Rules, so that at least automates some of what you were doing. But as far as I can tell, we don't have any rules currently for local deliveries or being able to handle local deliveries based on sender. Of course, as use cases come up we can add conditions and actions, so it may be something we can implement at a later date. 
Derek Curtis COO SmarterTools Inc. www.smartertools.com
Sabatino Replied
You did not understand the meaning of 3 and 4

- If it is any forward to an external address, use the following gateway

- if it is an alias with forwarding to an address outside the server, use the following gateway


I don't have to specify the sender or recipient 

The specific gateway must be used for the very fact that it is a forward to an external address or an alias to an external address.


Let me explain
I have users who put an alias of the type

or who have a mailbox 
info@domain.tld and then activate a forward (with or without deleting the message) to xxxx@outlook.com 


This tarnishes the reputation of the server.
So I would like these types of messages to use a specific gateway or IP. 

Also for bounces.
This ensures that the main IPs of the server maintain a high reputation.



Sabatino Traini Chief Information Officer Genial s.r.l. Martinsicuro - Italy

Reply to Thread

Enter the verification text