• Commercial products collect data while protecting their clients.  You can influence their reputation databases by becoming their customer and using their feedback mechanisms.  Feedback from non-customers is likely to be ignored.
• SpamHaus is the one public product that I have used.   They have to decide whether an assertion of malicious sender is legitimate or a malicious attack itself.   Consequently, SpamHaus says that they have a secret data collection process and they do not accept unsolicited reputation information.  So there is no known way to influence them directly.  

• A block on a domain name, whether in an email address or a host name, applies to both the domain name and all subdomains, unless an override entry is configured for a specific subdomain.
• A block on an email address applies whether the address appears as the Mail From address or the message's From header entry.

At the very least, SmarterMail should allow for reporting to the Abuse address for the domain. Seems like it should also allow for reporting abuse to the host. Mail accounts hosted by Google and Microsoft allow this. Amazon SES allows you to see how many people are making complaints about your emails. 

Seems like there should be some kind of escalation mechanism that handles abuse reports (domain abuse account, host abuse account, hosting facility abuse account, owner of the IP range, ... )

Things have changed though from years ago when there was nothing we could do about SPAM. Now that we can require SPF, DKIM, and DMARC since the big players (Google and Microsoft) now require them, we can definitely identify where mail is coming from. It is no longer a problem that we can't do anything about. If no one else is putting together a universal email Abuse mechanism, it seems like a golden business opportunity.