smtp authentication and no rDNS problem Declude
Question asked by Richard Frank - 7/18/2019 at 8:46 AM
I have a customer, using his account to send mail.
but his ISP skipped creating an rdns record (PTR)
Smartermail + Declude
piece of header
X-MessageSniffer-Identifier: c:\SmarterMail\Spool\proc\work\360983489.eml
X-GBUdb-Analysis: 0,, Ugly c=0.331706 p=-0.84 Source Normal
X-MessageSniffer-Scan-Result: 0
    0-0-0-2935-cX-RBL-Warning: WEIGHT10: Weight of 34 reaches or exceeds the limit of 10.
X-RBL-Warning: WEIGHT14: Weight of 34 reaches or exceeds the limit of 14.
X-RBL-Warning: WEIGHT20: Weight of 34 reaches or exceeds the limit of 20.
X-Declude-Sender: anton@dekrammer.nl []
X-Declude-Spoolname: 360983489.eml
X-Declude-Note: Scanned by Declude 4.12.11
X-Declude-Scan: Outgoing Score [34] at 16:08:05 on 18 Jul 2019
X-Declude-Tests: DNSWL [-5], CMDSPACE [8], REVDNS [12], FILTER-ZOMBIE [20], WEIGHT10 [10], WEIGHT14 [14], WEIGHT20 [20], WEIGHT30 [30]
X-Country-Chain: NETHERLANDS->destination
X-Declude-Code: e
X-Identity: | [No Reverse DNS] | soko.nl

My wish: no spam points added to succesfully authenticated smtp clients. Is that possible?
is that something I can config?

2 Replies

Reply to Thread
Sébastien Riccio Replied
Hi, isn't there an option in SmarterMail or Declude to skip spam checks for authenticated users ?

Sébastien Riccio System & Network Admin https://swisscenter.com
Linda Pagillo Replied
Hi Richard. My company created Declude. I will be happy to help. All authenticated senders should be automatically whitelisted by Declude if you have the whitelist auth directive turned on in Declude which it should be by default. This tells me that it is not being triggered for some reason. Can you please send me a copy of your global.cfg file to the email address in my signature or post the contents here and I will be happy to have a look? Thanks.
Linda Pagillo Mail's Best Friend Email: linda.pagillo@mailsbestfriend.com Web: www.mailsbestfriend.com Authorized SmarterTools Reseller Authorized Message Sniffer Reseller

Reply to Thread