SmarterMail 16.2.6349 is now available!
Idea shared by Derek Curtis - August 19, 2017 at 9:35 AM
Employee Post
We just released the latest minor for SmarterMail 16.2.6349! Check out the release notes for some IMPORTANT information and news on some Key Feature changes/additions. For example:
  • Advanced Search is available via the Folder icon in the Email area
  • Greater flexibility with Autodiscover
  • Hostname variable for auto-populating hostnames for new and existing domains
  • More efficiency changes, including pre-compression of files and updates to third-party components
  • Image cropping tool for account avatars and contact pictures
  • API completed for the Contacts area
  • The ability to further drill down in reports at the domain and system level
  • Greater flexibility for sharing files via File Storage
  • Lots more
Derek Curtis
SmarterTools Inc.
(877) 357-6278

2 Replies

Reply to Thread
It seems improved for sure. I deleted an email and the whole screen did NOT refresh as with the previous version. Thank you for that. 
I do have two main errors. When I did the upgrade I did a full uninstall, reboot, and install. Are there settings that I need to do for the 401?
/api/v1/auth/authenticate-user Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 401 (Unauthorized)
Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 (Not Found)
With 16.x I found out that at the user profile all telephone/mobile/fax numbers are lost. But when setting up more than 2 numbers only 2 numbers will be saved. How could this be solved? These settings are important for the signatures.
And with this actual release there is an advanced search available (click on folder icon at the bottom). Thank you very much to SmarterTools for implementing. It works but it's slow comparing to the search in SmarterMail 15.x and earlier and you can't open a mail from the result list by double clicking the items - you have to select it, scroll up and click on the Open button. This isn't very user friendly and I think that a search should be accessible at a more prominent place because it's a often used function.

Reply to Thread