Spam mail not marked as spam
Question asked by Hemen Shah - 12/1/2016 at 12:26 AM
Unanswered
Hi,
 
Am using SM 15.X with declude hijack
 
below are 2 raw headers and are spam mails as per score but still not flagged as SPAM, where it would be going wrong ?
 
Return-Path: <lwl@zyaudit.com>
Received: from zyaudit.com (184.0.216.162.static.reverse.as19531.net [162.216.0.184]) by mailserver.abc.com with SMTP;
   Wed, 30 Nov 2016 14:41:56 -0500
From: " Terry Wood" <lwl@zyaudit.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 14:02:47 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Trick how to restore your DEAD battery
To: <user@customer.com>
Message-ID: <VOZCkjeQmC1HNb0pvLjMSU5y_cjpGknnQwU1Hxzdq3k.P2Z8m_zIiO_FkT35I1Vd_99C5L_n4XA6C14mjCXJHw8@zyaudit.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------857349516189786054220021"
X-RBL-Warning: WEIGHT10: Weight of 47 reaches or exceeds the limit of 10.
X-RBL-Warning: WEIGHT14: Weight of 47 reaches or exceeds the limit of 14.
X-RBL-Warning: WEIGHT20: Weight of 47 reaches or exceeds the limit of 20.
X-RBL-Warning: WEIGHT30: Weight of 47 reaches or exceeds the limit of 30.
X-Declude-Sender: lwl@zyaudit.com [162.216.0.184]
X-Declude-Spoolname: 237705808.eml
X-Declude-RefID: 
X-Declude-Note: Scanned by Declude 4.12.11
X-Declude-Scan: Incoming Score [47] at 14:42:29 on 30 Nov 2016
X-Declude-Tests: MAILSPIKE-L2 [6], MAILSPIKE-H2 [-2], ZEN [15], SPAMHAUS-DBL1 [10], SPAMHAUS-DBL3 [10], SPAMHAUS-DBL4 [10], SPFPASS [-1], FILTER-SPAM [3], WEIGHT10 [10], WEIGHT14 [14], WEIGHT20 [20], WEIGHT30 [30]
X-Country-Chain: 
X-Declude-Code: e
X-HELO: zyaudit.com
X-Identity: 162.216.0.184 | 184.0.216.162.static.reverse.as19531.net | zyaudit.com
X-SmarterMail-Spam: SPF_Pass, DK_None, DKIM_None, Declude: 47
X-SmarterMail-TotalSpamWeight: 47
 
 
Return-Path: <sulfuric@zyaudit.com>
Received: from zyaudit.com (184.0.216.162.static.reverse.as19531.net [162.216.0.184]) by mailserver.abc.com with SMTP;
   Wed, 30 Nov 2016 14:36:40 -0500
From: "Yahoo-News" <sulfuric@zyaudit.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 14:06:26 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Super drink recipe shrinking belly fat
To: <user@customer.com>
Message-ID: <2q_pbTGxWEMwvpmcq4fWljsve9nH_FLlzbYhiMjydQ8.Qkp6gpXxih2MQEQ9vsEr__5fY5CPrd3OiAy_lJWB9EI@zyaudit.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------88431356689387877761161"
X-RBL-Warning: WEIGHT10: Weight of 38 reaches or exceeds the limit of 10.
X-RBL-Warning: WEIGHT14: Weight of 38 reaches or exceeds the limit of 14.
X-RBL-Warning: WEIGHT20: Weight of 38 reaches or exceeds the limit of 20.
X-RBL-Warning: WEIGHT30: Weight of 38 reaches or exceeds the limit of 30.
X-Declude-Sender: sulfuric@zyaudit.com [162.216.0.184]
X-Declude-Spoolname: 237705799.eml
X-Declude-RefID: 
X-Declude-Note: Scanned by Declude 4.12.11
X-Declude-Scan: Incoming Score [38] at 14:37:15 on 30 Nov 2016
X-Declude-Tests: MAILSPIKE-H2 [-2], MAILSPIKE-H3 [-3], ZEN [15], SPAMHAUS-DBL1 [10], SPAMHAUS-DBL3 [10], SPAMHAUS-DBL4 [10], SPFPASS [-1], FILTER-SPAM [3], WEIGHT10 [10], WEIGHT14 [14], WEIGHT20 [20], WEIGHT30 [30]
X-Country-Chain: 
X-Declude-Code: e
X-HELO: zyaudit.com
X-Identity: 162.216.0.184 | 184.0.216.162.static.reverse.as19531.net | zyaudit.com
X-SmarterMail-Spam: SPF_Pass, Bayesian Filtering, DK_None, DKIM_None, Declude: 38
X-SmarterMail-TotalSpamWeight: 48
 
 
Thanks
Sean Middlemore Replied
What weight threshold's do you have set under Antispam Administration then Filtering? That would give us a clue.
 
Sean
Hemen Shah Replied
Thresholds as below
 
Low Probability - 10 - No Action
Medium Probability - 25 - Move to Junk
High Probability - 30 - Move to Junk
 
Thanks
Sean Middlemore Replied
Are you finding they're not being moved to the Junk box then?
 
Sean
Hemen Shah Replied
Yes, not getting moved to SPAM
Sean Middlemore Replied
For the domain it's going to, is the spammers email address and/or domain in the trusted senders list? That could cause a bypass and leave it in the inbox
Hemen Shah Replied
checked nothing as such
Employee Replied
Employee Post
Hi Hemen.  From your examples, these messages should certainly be being delivered to the spam folder.  I would check both the domain and the end-user spam filtering settings and verify that the system level settings are not being overridden.  I see this happen quite often.  I hope this helps.
Hemen Shah Replied
Hi Rod, we dont allow spam settings to be overridden so thats out of question.

Reply to Thread

Enter the verification text