1
Weird issue with spamhaus.org DBLs
Question asked by Andrew Stein - 8/28/2014 at 2:36 PM
Unanswered
I'm using SM 12 with my own in-house DNS servers that are not using public DNS for forwarders on a relatively low volume server.   
 
The problem is that every few hours, zen.spamhaus.org and dbl.spamhaus.org stop responding to my queries unless I go in and clear out the cache on my DNS server.  This is not happening on any other blacklists including Barracuda, multi.surbl.org, Sorbs, etc.   My first thought is that they were blocking my IP from doing queries, but if that's the case, clearing the cache on the DNS server shouldn't fix it.   Anyone run into a similar issue and any thoughts on how to fix it permanently?  I don't want to have to remember to clear the cache every few hours or even run a script as I suspect that is just a bandaid and not  a real solution..

12 Replies

Reply to Thread
0
Steve Reid Replied
I am having a similar issue with just a couple lookups, I posted about it in this thread: http://portal.smartertools.com/community/a273/rbl-needs-attention.aspx

Where are you clearing the cache?
1
Bruce Barnes Replied
Unless you have a subscription to the RBL service, you are being limited to between 100K and 200K queries per day to that RBL listing service.
 
If you are using anything other than a PRIVATE DNS, which belongs to you, and is run by you, then those DNS servers can easily generate in excess of millions of RBL queries per day.
 
Once the threshold for the number of queries per day set by an RBL is exceeded by any DNS server's IP address, the RBL begins to return weird responses.  These are sometimes "non-responses" where the RBL simply does not respond to the query and the query hangs.  In other cases, a false positive response is returned and the query bounces legitimate e-mail.
 
SUMMARY:  To prevent these issues:
  • Run your own DNS and query the RBL via your DNS servers
     
  • Never cache a DNS server in SmarterMail - always allow SmarterMail to request a fresh DNS query.
Bruce Barnes ChicagoNetTech Inc brucecnt@comcast.net Phonr: (773) 491-9019 Phone: (224) 444-0169 E-Mail and DNS Security Specialist Network Security Specialist Customer Service Portal: https://portal.chicagonettech.com Website: https://www.ChicagoNetTech.com Security Blog: http://networkbastion.blogspot.com/ Web and E-Mail Hosting, E-Mail Security and Consulting
0
Andrew Stein Replied
Well, I am running my own private DNS and my server is low volume. We average maybe 5000 messages a day. Even if all the emails had multiple links for the URIBL to check, it'd still be well less than 100k queries a day. Also, clearing the cache shouldn't fix this if we were being blocked. I feel this is a problem specifically with my DNS server but I'm damned if I can figure out why it is choking on spamhaus queries and nothing else.
0
Steve Reid Replied
Do not cache, turn off the option is Smartermail
1
Joe Wolf Replied
What DNS resolver are you using?  When you say you clear your DNS cache are you saying you have stale records in your DNS resolver cache?  Don't use the SmarterMail DNS cache option.
 
Sounds like you may need to force your DNS resolver to honor TTL and/or force a maximum TTL.  If it's not honoring those settings then you have a corrupt DNS install.
 
I recommend you use the SmarterMail server DNS server as a resolver.
 
-Joe
Thanks, -Joe
0
Andrew Stein Replied
SM is installed on Windows 2012 Essentials.  I'm running the Windows DNS server and in SM, left the primary and secondary DNS server blank so that it will use Windows.   The Windows DNS server itself is using the root hints and has no forwarders configured.

Every couple hours, the average resolve time for Spamhaus will go from ~500ms to ~150,000ms and counting.   When that happens, querying dbl.spamhaus.org via nslookup will time out.   When that happens, I'll fire up the Windows DNS MMC, right click on Cached Lookups and select Clear Cache.   Afterwards, it immediately starts resolving again.   This is the only domain name this happens to, everything else, including all my other RBLs, resolve fine.
 
My backup MX server, which is setup similarly (albeit on Windows 2003), doesn't seem to have this issue.  I'll update this later today and report my results.
 
I haven't rebooted my server in awhile, so I'll try that first.   If that doesn't yield results, I'm going to experiment and tell my primary SM  to use the other Windows 2003 DNS server and see if it has the same issue.   
 
0
Andrew Stein Replied
Rebooting didn't seem to help.   I just told SM to use the other Windows server as its primary DNS server and well see what happens.
1
Andrew Stein Replied
Quick update.  Apparently Windows 2011 and 2012 Essentials automatically populates your gateway as a DNS forwarder from time to time.   I suspect my problems start occurring shortly after this happens.   I removed the forwarder and will see if the problem starts to occur when it reappears.  If so, I have to run a script periodically that removes all forwarders.   What a pain.
0
Andrew Stein Replied
The Windows server that SM is installed on is also doing the DNS. I open the DNS MMC, right click on Cached Lookups and select clear cache.
0
Andrew Stein Replied
I'm clearing the Windows DNS cache. SM cache is disabled.
0
Andrew Stein Replied
Well, that was a bust.   Spamhaus stopped resolving and my gateway had not yet reappeared as a forwarder.   I configured SM to use the other server for DNS.  Unfortunately, the other server is on the far side of a VPN and the router it is using is more limited in the amount of connections per device.   DNS stopped responding altogether within minutes, so I had to back out of it.
 
I'm setting up a scheduled task to clear the Windows DNS Server's cache every 2 hours, but that is just a band-aid.   The problem has to be either with my DNS server settings or possibly a firewall issue.   If I figure out a permanent solution, I'll update the thread, but any more suggestions would be appreciated.
0
Steve Reid Replied
This may be the last resort, but for testing purposes you could subscribe to a DNS hosting service. If it works nice then you could keep it, or hopefully you'll figure out the issue with Windows 2012
 

Reply to Thread